Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Toronto’s Rouge Park to become Canada’s first urban national park

Published by CityMayors.com on July 6, 2011
http://www.citymayors.com/environment/toronto-rouge-park.html

6 July 2011: With the election of the federal Conservatives the outlook on the urban agenda in Canada was mixed. But the recent Throne speech provided some optimism for Canadian urbanism outlining the creation of Canada’s first urban national park in the Greater Toronto Area, although there were no funds promised in the budget.

Rouge Park, designated a provincial park by the Province of Ontario in 1995, is slated to take its place along the other 42 National Parks and National Park Reserves in Canada. Although there are more than 12 government organizations and one non-profit owning and managing the land, including the Toronto Region Conservation Authority, the cities of Markham and Toronto, and the Province, it is expected to be taken over by Parks Canada within two years once a national park plan is in place.

The Throne speech read, “In this, the 100th anniversary year of our national parks system, our government will create significant new protected areas. It will work with provincial, regional, municipal, aboriginal and community stakeholders toward establishing an urban national park in the Rouge Valley of eastern Toronto.”

As the federal Conservatives increase their focus on the Greater Toronto Area, some may either see this as a celebration of their recent success in the region or a means of gaining further support.

Despite the lack of funding Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath is confident the project will move forward. “I would have liked to see funding in the federal budget, as it gives more than anything else the intention of the federal government. But it doesn’t stymie us or set us back.”

Toronto City Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker also weighed in on the announcement. “It truly is, by a historic fluke, almost an untouched wilderness area, a small wilderness area on the edge of the city of Toronto. It has taken a couple of decades, but to see this in writing, in a government document, in a throne speech telling the nation what they are going to do is fabulous.” Councillor De Baeremaeker had been fighting for the designation for 25 years.

Alan Wells, chair of the Rouge Park Alliance said, “Parks Canada brings resources that we don’t have, like park wardens to stop poachers and to keep the trails safe. The trails need a lot of maintenance, so it’s bigger than the City of Toronto can manage.”

Located within the boundaries of Toronto, Pickering, Markham and Stouffville, Rouge Park will be Canada’s first national park to be located within a municipality. Covering an area thirteen times the size of New York’s Central Park, it is also considered the largest nature park located within a metropolitan core in North America. The Rouge’s urban surroundings will give it a unique feel from all other National Parks in Canada. The Rouge will be the fifth smallest of all National Parks and National Park Reserves. It will also be accessible by public transit as Toronto Transit Commission buses and GO Transit, the provincial bus and rail commuter transit system, currently serve the park. Unfortunately its urban surroundings also pose a significant threat especially through residential development in Toronto and Markham.

As Toronto’s biggest wetland, Rouge Park has the most bio-diverse ecosystem in the region, home to 762 plant species, including six nationally rare species and 92 regionally rare species. It is also home to over 300 bird, fish, mammal and reptile species, many of which are locally, regionally and nationally rare. It has six major waterways running through it which run through four municipalities, including the Rouge River, Toronto’s most healthy river.

According to the Rouge Park Alliance, “The Rouge Park is Canada’s premier urban wilderness park protecting two National Historic Sites, and the only working farms in Toronto.”

From the 19th century to the 1950s the Rouge served as an urban retreat, home to many resorts and cottages, and it currently has three golf courses in the vicinity, and 16 kilometres of trails and campgrounds running through it. The hope is that with the National Park designation it will become North America's premier urban wilderness.

The park also has a strong agricultural heritage, having many farmers as tenants. The park’s main objective is the preservation of “near-urban agriculture” although the alliance recently made a confidential decision to end leases for over 700 acres of farmland. Mr. Wells has said in the past he would like to see the Federal Government add 5,000 acres in farmland to the park which was expropriated for the failed Pickering Airport project. As discussions on the National Park designation heated up in late 2010, farmers, whose lands were expropriated 40 years ago for the creation of the Pickering Airport, expressed concern over the proposal.

Human history in the Rouge, which was once covered by a glacier, goes back over 10,000 years to Palaeolithic nomadic hunters, Iroquoian women farmers and early European explorers, and with the National Park designation the natural environment and human activity will be a part of the area for many years to come.

Gatineau Park could learn from Rouge Valley

Published by Open File on Friday, July 15, 2011
http://ottawa.openfile.ca/blog/news/2011/gatineau-park-could-learn-rouge-valley 

The federal Conservatives recently announced their intention to create Canada’s first urban national park at Rouge Park in the Greater Toronto Area, the culmination of over two decades of local advocacy. Some conservationists in the National Capital Region might have groaned upon hearing that, since there’s a park in their backyard they’ve thought for years deserves the same distinction. But Rouge Park’s fate could inject new energy into the movement to transform Gatineau Park into a national park—and it should.

Many residents who live anywhere near Gatineau Park have long advocated for greater protection for the park, up to and including national park status. That protection, they say, is integral to the park surviving in an era of clear cuts and subdivisions. The first of the park’s notable defenders was James Harkin, Canada’s first national parks commissioner—he started the job in 1911—who envisioned Gatineau Park as not only Quebec’s first national park—but Canada’s first national park outside the Rocky Mountains.

That vision was reflected in a letter Harkin sent to then-deputy minister of the interior William Cory on Dec. 3, 1913.
“The East has no national parks like those in the Rockies, and it is proposed that the country develop a broader scheme of park than exists in any other country ... Bringing into effect the proposed Gatineau Park ... would, I think, more easily commence this scheme.”
How could that vision for Gatineau Park have changed so much within a few generations? Why is Rouge Park—sprawling urban wilderness on the outskirts of a large city—worthy of national park status if Gatineau Park, which shares many of those attributes, is denied the same fate?
More recently than 1913, others have taken up the cause where Harkin left off. On Oct. 5, 2006, Liberal senator Tommy Banks commented in the Senate that Gatineau Park was supposed to be Canada’s first national park—period.

“If there is any place in Canada that ought to be a national park ... it is Gatineau Park. For one thing, it was supposed to be Canada’s first national park created under the National Parks Branch— not only the first national park for Quebec, and not only the first national park advocated to be created outside of the Rocky Mountains of the West, it was also the first park advocated for creation by the first parks branch in the world, which was in Canada.”

Senator Banks went on to say that Gatineau Park is the only federal park in Canada that is not a national park.

Paul Dewar, the local NDP MP, has also contributed to the file. In 2008, he launched a community campaign to protect Gatineau Park, following in the footsteps of his local predecessor, former NDP leader Ed Broadbent —and has either introduced or supported various prospective laws that aim to protect the park.

We’ve heard a number of reasons why Gatineau Park can’t be a national park. One is the Quebec government never ceded ownership of the land to the feds, while others say the exchange has already taken place. That there are already two national parks in Quebec lends credibility to the notion that the province is open to such parks.

Critics say it would also be too expensive to convert Gatineau Park into a national park due to the cost of meeting International Union for Conservation Nature standards. Parks Canada seems to have no problem adhering to these expensive standards in the case of Rouge Park.

A reason we’ve heard from former Liberal MP Marcel Proulx: Gatineau Park’s allowed recreational activities might change if it’s a national park. The main activities in the park now are camping, hiking, biking, canoeing, and downhill and cross-country skiing—which we also find in Banff National Park. People wouldn’t be able to own property within the park, which would affect cottages, but the Town of Banff—a municipality within Banff National Park that currently has a population of over 8,000—could provide us with a model for accommodating recreational residential development at Gatineau Park.

Proulx also commented that visitors wouldn’t have free access to the park if it became a national park.
According to the Parks Canada website, it costs $9.80 to visit a national park, and “every time you visit a park or site you are in investing in its future.” I’m sure that those using Gatineau Park wouldn’t mind investing in it for less than the price of going to the movie theatre.

Rouge National Park could be the first of many urban national parks in Canada. As the importance of cities increases globally, Parks Canada should introduce a new urban national parks sub-group. Such a program could help to preserve urban wilderness across Canada.

Maybe that means including Cypress Provincial Park in West Vancouver, Fish Creek Provincial Park in Calgary, and the North Saskatchewan River valley parks system in Edmonton—or any other parks that deserve the distinction.

It’s time to at least reboot the discussion about the future of our own urban federal park. After all, it’s right down the road from the same legislature that approved the initial financing of the urban national park that will envelope the Rouge Valley. What better time could there be to talk about it?

Monday, May 9, 2011

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Canada uses the web to fight urban gridlock

Hello All,

Here's my latest article for CityMayors.com about the #CutMyCommute campaign of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). Enjoy!

Kevin


Canada uses the web to fight urban gridlock

Ottawa, 19 April 2011: As social media and Web 2.0 play an increasingly integral role in political communications, it is no wonder that organizations like the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the national voice for municipal government in Canada, have followed suit. This week the Federation, which represents 2000 members, including 21 provincial and territorial municipal associations, launched their CutMyCommute social media campaign challenging all federal political parties to fix gridlock in Canada’s cities.

Aside from raising awareness during the current federal election, the ultimate objective of the campaign, supported by the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), the Canadian Construction Association (CCA) and the Toronto Board of Trade, is to cut commute times nationally.

According to FCM, “Since the federal election was called [on 26 March 2011], long commute times have cost the economy $292 million and Canadians have wasted 2.7 million working days stuck in traffic.”

Carl Zehr, Mayor of the City of Kitchener and Chair of FCM’s Big City Mayors Caucus (BCMC), has also weighed in on the issue. “While their campaign buses are rolling across the country, party leaders need to take a good look out the window at the traffic gridlock chocking our cities. Reducing commute times must be a priority in this election and in the future, no matter which party forms the next government.”

As the average Canadian living in a big city spends an average of 75 minutes per day commuting, it is believed that long commute times are hurting Canada’s economic competitiveness with traffic delays costing more than $5 billion per year in 2006. In Toronto it is estimated that drivers spend roughly two working weeks a year stuck in traffic.

Zehr went on to say, “This is a national problem requiring a national solution. Every hour Canadians spend on the road is an hour they spend away from their families, their businesses, and their studies. That’s time none of us can afford to lose.”

Municipalities are calling on federal party leaders to set concrete targets to cap rising commute times; to reinvest more of the tax dollars Canadians send to the Federal Government in new buses, subways, and commuter rail; and to work with municipalities, provinces and territories to fill critical transportation gaps.

The campaign
website has a number of tools for visitors including a rolling counter of how much commute times have cost the economy and Canadians since the beginning of the election. The website is also equipped with an online calculator allowing visitors to find out what their daily commute costs the economy, their pocketbook, and time to spend with their family, friends and businesses. (Report by Kevin Bourne)

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Canada’s political parties present urban agendas ahead of election

Here is the link for my latest article for CityMayors.com about the urban agendas of the political parties in the Canadian federal election. Enjoy!

http://www.citymayors.com/politics/canada-elections-2011.html

Kevin

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Kevin Bourne, Freelance Writer

Hello Everyone,

Welcome to my freelance writing site. Here you will find samples of my writing and news on my latest pieces. Feel free to contact me for all of your writing needs from journalistic articles to blog posts and business writing. Talk to you soon!

Kevin Bourne